In this white paper, we compared SwiftMR™-processed MR exams to the standard of care. We analyzed 184 MR exam pairs from 12 anatomical locations, considering various pathologies, scanner vendors, and field strengths. Eighteen board-certified radiologists from six subspecialties assessed these exams for anatomical and lesion clarity, as well as image quality factors like signal-to-noise ratio, spatial resolution, and contrast. In 93.7% of cases, the SwiftMR™-processed images demonstrated better subjective image quality, despite reduced scan times.
MRI plays a pivotal role in modern medicine, so any AI technology affecting MRI imaging requires thorough validation. This white paper shows how SwiftMR™ has been rigorously tested in a large, multi-center study, in addition to peer-reviewed papers and ongoing studies confirming its performance in various clinical scenarios.
In this white paper, we compared SwiftMR™-processed MR exams to the standard of care. We analyzed 184 MR exam pairs from 12 anatomical locations, considering various pathologies, scanner vendors, and field strengths. Eighteen board-certified radiologists from six subspecialties assessed these exams for anatomical and lesion clarity, as well as image quality factors like signal-to-noise ratio, spatial resolution, and contrast. In 93.7% of cases, the SwiftMR™-processed images demonstrated better subjective image quality, despite reduced scan times.
MRI plays a pivotal role in modern medicine, so any AI technology affecting MRI imaging requires thorough validation. This white paper shows how SwiftMR™ has been rigorously tested in a large, multi-center study, in addition to peer-reviewed papers and ongoing studies confirming its performance in various clinical scenarios.